Engineering Records Intelligence
Ingests and connects drawings, specifications, inspection histories, vendor records, commissioning evidence and asset tags.
View system →
Asset Reliability, CMMS & Engineering Data Programs
Build the engineering information and reliability system behind the asset.
Enterprise and multi-site reliability, CMMS/EAM, engineering-record and asset-data programs that make equipment identifiable, maintainable, inspectable and supportable.
- UEI
- ZR3PJZEA7A21
- CAGE
- 174X8
- Independence
- Findings challenged before release
- Deployment
- Remote response within 24 hours
When Clients Call BPG
Does the organization need a structured engineering program or transformation?
Decision supported
What broader reliability, maintenance or asset-information system must be built, corrected or governed.
Retained by
- Owners and operators
- Reliability and maintenance leaders
- Engineering information teams
- Asset managers
- Capital-program leadership
Questions we are asked
- Can the owner identify and support every critical asset?
- Does CMMS data reflect the physical plant?
- Which failure modes should drive maintenance?
- How should the program scale across sites?
Core Capabilities
Focused technical scope for the decision at hand.
01
Reliability and integrity programs
Repeatable methods for controlling equipment and lifecycle risk.
- RCM, FMECA and criticality analysis
- Mechanical integrity and inspection strategy
- Bad-actor and condition-monitoring programs
- Maintenance optimization and integrity governance
02
Engineering records and asset intelligence
Technical records reconciled into a usable asset context.
- Engineering-document cleanup and revision comparison
- Legacy-record digitization and reconciliation
- Asset-document relationships and missing-record identification
- Multi-site information standards and completeness controls
03
CMMS / EAM implementation and optimization
Engineering-led master data built for real maintenance execution.
- Enterprise hierarchy, taxonomy and tag normalization
- Master-data migration, cleanup and updates
- PM optimization and maintenance-task loading
- BOM, spares and technical-document linkage
04
SAP, Maximo and client-system readiness
Structured data prepared and validated for the owner’s operating environment.
- SAP and IBM Maximo implementation support
- Source-to-target mapping and load-file QA/QC
- Commissioning and maintenance-record linkage
- Data governance, stewardship and exception control
05
Major technical decision support
Program-level engineering support for consequential portfolio choices.
- Repair versus replace and life extension
- Major-overhaul and outage strategy
- Critical-spare and obsolescence strategy
- Upgrade, modernization and technology selection
Typical Deliverables
What you receive.
Structured for use by technical, commercial, financial, insurance and legal readers.
- 01Reliability or integrity strategy
- 02Criticality and FMECA register
- 03CMMS / EAM hierarchy and validated master-data load
- 04Engineering-record and asset-intelligence deliverable
- 05Multi-site governance standard and program roadmap
How BPG Works
A governed path from scope to deliverable.
01
Scope
02
Evidence
03
Analysis
04
Specialist Review
05
Responsible Engineer Review
06
Deliverable
Tools Capability
Engineering, data and evidence systems selected for the assignment.
Software accelerates ingestion, comparison, traceability and analysis. Accountable engineers validate the evidence and approve the conclusions.
PDF.TerraTolga / Vault Compare
Compares drawings and document revisions, detects changes and identifies superseded or inconsistent records.
View system →Criticality
Ranks assets and work by consequence so inspection, spares, maintenance and capital follow risk.
View system →FMECA
Structures failure modes, safeguards, inspection requirements and maintenance strategy.
View system →CMMS / EAM execution
Develops and updates hierarchies, master data, PM tasks, BOMs, spares and technical-record links in SAP, IBM Maximo and client systems.
Engineering Governance
How independence is protected.
Institutional clients rely on the process behind the opinion as much as the opinion itself.
01
Independence
We are retained for an engineering answer, not a predetermined conclusion. Findings are stated with their limitations.
02
Conflicts screening
Every prospective engagement is screened against parties, assets and prior involvement before scope is accepted.
03
Confidentiality
Transaction, project, claims and operating data are handled under controlled access arrangements appropriate to the engagement.
04
Evidence handling
Physical and digital evidence is documented, secured and traced for technical and adversarial review.
05
Responsible Engineer review
Before release, conclusions are challenged outside the primary discipline to test assumptions, method, evidence and judgment.
06
Professional liability
The firm carries professional liability cover and works to recognized engineering standards of care.
Relevant Industries
Applied across critical asset environments.
- Power generation
- Oil, gas and LNG
- Chemicals and process
- Data centers
- Mining
- Manufacturing and infrastructure
Related Insights
Technical analysis behind the work.
Mission Critical
From Factory Lot to Live Data Hall: Engineering the Fiber Lifecycle to Prevent Latent Failure
Read insight →Machinery Diagnostics
Vibration in a Turbine, Gearbox and Generator Train: Separating the Defect From the Cause
Read insight →Asset & Transaction Advisory
The Hidden Failure Risk Inside an Industrial Acquisition
Read insight →Related Services
Where the evidence can lead next.
Focused technical work can reveal broader asset or project risks that require additional engineering attention.
Build a reliability and information system operations can use.
Initial conversations are confidential and without obligation. We will confirm independence before scope is discussed.