IP & Technology Disputes
Engineering analysis of how technology actually works.
Independent analysis of technology function, implementation and performance in intellectual property, licensing and technology performance disputes across industrial systems, controls and equipment.
- UEI
- ZR3PJZEA7A21
- CAGE
- 174X8
- Independence
- Findings challenged before release
- Deployment
- Remote response within 24 hours
Decision supported
What the technology does, and whether it performs as claimed.
Retained by
- IP counsel
- Technology owners
- Licensors and licensees
- Industrial manufacturers
Questions we are asked
- What does the system actually do?
- Does the implementation match the claim?
- Did the technology perform as represented?
- What is the technical basis for the loss?
Scope of Work
What the engagement covers.
Technology characterization
An engineering description of the accused or asserted system as it is actually implemented.
- Function, architecture and implementation analysis
- Comparison against asserted claims or specifications
- Source of function established by inspection and testing
- Prior art and state of the art technical review
Performance and implementation
Whether the technology performs as represented in the operating environment.
- Performance testing under representative conditions
- Failure to perform separated from misapplication
- Integration and interoperability analysis
- Technical basis for damages inputs
Work Product
What you receive.
Written to be used by technical, commercial and legal readers without translation.
- 01Technical claim mapping
- 02Performance test program and results
- 03Expert report
- 04Technical demonstratives
Method
How the work is sequenced.
Scope and conflicts check
Technology inspection
Claim and specification mapping
Testing and analysis
Report and testimony
Engineering Governance
How independence is protected.
Institutional clients rely on the process behind the opinion as much as the opinion itself.
Independence
We are retained for an engineering answer, not a predetermined conclusion. Findings are stated with their limitations.
Conflicts screening
Every prospective engagement is screened against parties, assets and prior involvement before scope is accepted.
Confidentiality
Transaction and claims material is handled under confidentiality, with controlled access and clean-team arrangements where required.
Evidence handling
Physical evidence is documented, secured and tracked with chain of custody suitable for adversarial review.
Peer review
Conclusions are challenged by a specialist outside the primary discipline before release.
Professional liability
The firm carries professional liability cover and works to recognized engineering standards of care.
Related Capability
Adjacent work we are retained for.
Discuss a technology matter.
Initial conversations are confidential and without obligation. We will confirm independence before scope is discussed.